Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody
Features & pricing compared · AI Coding Assistants
Cursor and Sourcegraph Cody are both ai coding assistants tools, so founders often weigh them against each other. This comparison lines up their verified capabilities, pricing structure, and deployment side by side. Features & pricing compared is the headline difference.
Cursor lists 2 paid plan(s).
Sourcegraph Cody lists 1 paid plan(s).
Cursor additionally shows Two-factor auth, Mobile app, Team collaboration, Automation / workflows, Roles & permissions, which Sourcegraph Cody does not advertise.
Sourcegraph Cody additionally shows Single sign-on (SSO), Integrations, Analytics & reporting, Audit log, Priority support, which Cursor does not advertise.
| Feature | Cursor | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ |
| Two-factor auth | ✓ | — |
| Integrations | — | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | — |
| Analytics & reporting | — | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | ✓ | — |
| Automation / workflows | ✓ | — |
| Roles & permissions | ✓ | — |
| Audit log | — | ✓ |
| Priority support | — | ✓ |
Cursor
AI-native code editor that understands your whole repo
- Deployment
- Cloud (hosted)
- Platforms
- ios, macos
Pricing
- Individual$20/mo
- Teams$40/mo
Sourcegraph Cody
Codebase-aware AI assistant for large engineering teams
- Deployment
- Cloud (hosted)
Pricing
- Enterprise plan$16/mo
Facts are captured from each vendor's own site and verified by our crawler. Pricing can change — check the vendor for the latest.